Articles Posted in Car Accident

Published on:

A plaintiff in a Florida car accident case is entitled to a jury trial on the issues of negligence and damages, despite a trial court’s earlier ruling to the contrary. That’s per Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal in the case of Whritenour v. Thompson, where the strategic bankruptcy filing of a defendant threatened to derail the case.

Palm Beach County car accident lawyers know there are some personal injury debts that can be discharged in a bankruptcy filing. Where motor vehicle accidents are involved, the bankruptcy court excludes injuries caused by drunk drivers or those where the injuries were caused by willful or malicious intent.

Still, all others, considered “creditors” in the bankruptcy case, can file an “adversary proceeding,” requesting the court to set aside the automatic stay and discharge and force the debtor to pay.
Continue reading →

Published on:

The plaintiff in a Florida car accident lawsuit was reportedly captured on surveillance cameras engaging in activities he had purportedly claimed in his deposition testimony to be unable to perform following the crash.

As a result, the trial court issued a final judgment dismissing his claim in Guillen v. Vang et al. He appealed to Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal, requesting reversal of that ruling – which was granted. The court found the video evidence alone wasn’t enough to prove the plaintiff had set in motion some unconscionable scheme designed to trick the court and enrich himself.

Broward car accident lawyers believe the justices here reached the right conclusion because there is a fine line between what constitutes fraud and what is actually forgetfulness, a misunderstanding or a genuine mistake. In some cases, even when plaintiffs have been caught in outright lies, the court has held this is not necessarily proof of fraud on the court.
Continue reading →

Published on:

Self-driving cars may not be yet available to consumers, but they are already raising debate about the age-old man versus technology question. When a vehicle has a reaction time quicker than a human driver and can make decisions quicker than the average person behind the wheel, what are the lasting implications?

Where human drivers are susceptible to error, irritation, mood swings, fatigue and other varying contingents that can impact the ability to drive, a self-driving car isn’t. This could put technology ahead of human drivers in terms of safety.

Self-driving cars have been safely navigating California roads and highways for years. According to Slate Magazine report, a new Google Video illustrates the strategic abilities of these vehicles to prevent accidents and injuries. Our Fort Lauderdale car accident attorneys are dedicated to preventing accidents and keeping the roads safe for Florida drivers. In addition to raising awareness about safety and technology advancements, we are committed to pursuing justice on behalf of individuals who have been injured in an accident.
Continue reading →

Published on:

In order to win a lawsuit against a reckless or negligent driver, one has to prove that not only was the driver negligent, but that her negligence caused the crash, and further that the crash caused the injuries alleged.

Each element has to be met in order for a crash injury victim to receive damages – something our Hollywood car accident attorneys are experienced in securing.

The recent case of Pralle v. Milwicz provides an example of how a case can unfold when this burden is not met.
Continue reading →

Published on:

When auto insurance companies act in bad faith by refusing or unnecessarily delaying a claim by an injured party, they may face court sanctions and penalties, in addition to being forced to pay the original claim.

In cases where an insurer is acting in bad faith by refusing to cover claims made by their at-fault driver insured, injured parties may pursue something known as a “Coblentz agreement.” This involves negotiating a settlement that will bind the insurer, even though the insurer hasn’t participated in settlement talks. The “Coblentz agreement,” named after a previous South Florida car accident case, is when the at-fault insured assigns his or her rights to pursue a bad faith insurance claim against his or her insurer over to the injured party.

Fort Lauderdale car accident lawyers know that in order for a Coblentz agreement to be successful, attorneys for the injured need to make sure there is a strong case establishing the insurer is acting in bad faith in refusing to indemnify its client or pay the claim.
Continue reading →

Published on:

In some car accident lawsuits, more than one party can be found at-fault. Fortunately, we live in a state where being partially at-fault doesn’t negate your right to collect compensation. However, per the pure comparative fault model by which the statute abides, the amount of your award is reduced proportionately by the degree of fault.

That’s why Broward County car accident lawyers know it is important to present a strong, convincing argument to the courts, based on the facts, that reduces your liability by the greatest degree possible.

Hall v. County of Lancaster, reviewed recently by the Nebraska Supreme Court, illustrates why this can sometimes be a challenge.
Continue reading →

Published on:

Less than a month ago, a New York booze magnate was killed in a Miami Beach crash wherein his brother-in-law was allegedly operating a $400,000 Lamborghini intoxicated at 120-miles-per-hour.

The brother-in-law was seriously injured, but Double Cross Vodka mogul Malcom Lloyd was killed instantly. The driver of a sport-utility-vehicle was also seriously injured.

While the criminal case against that driver is pending, including charges of DUI manslaughter and vehicular assault, Lloyd’s widow has filed a civil case against him on behalf of herself, her husband’s estate and their two young sons, ages 1 and 5.

West Palm Beach car accident lawyers recognize that Lloyd v. Toro is complicated not only by the fact that there is a criminal matter pending, but also because the widow lives out-of-state, keeping residents in Maine and New York.
Continue reading →

Published on:

Any time there is a pending personal injury action, it’s imperative that the plaintiff establish a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

A lot of times in Fort Lauderdale car accident lawsuits, this is fairly simple. Any person who gets behind the wheel owes a duty of care to all fellow motorists, passengers, pedestrians and cyclists, which can be met by obeying all traffic laws, using reasonable caution and not driving recklessly.

However, there are some situations, particularly in third-party litigation actions, in which the duty of care issue can be a bit more complex. Vicarious liability is a good example. This is the principle that holds that a third party (usually a parent or employer) can be held liable for another simply by virtue of the fact that they had control over the person, vehicle, situation, etc.
Continue reading →

Published on:

There is an old principle of English common law that says a master can be held liable for the actions of his servant if the master places the servant in control of something dangerous and an injury occurs as a result. It’s called the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, and it’s been adopted by Florida courts as well, though in practical terms, it’s not “master-and-servant,” but “employer-and-employee” or “parent-and-child.”

This idea that one party can be held liable for the actions of another is something called vicarious liability.

It was on the grounds of the dangerous instrumentality doctrine that one Florida widow sought to establish vicarious liability for the ex-husband of the woman who was behind the wheel of the vehicle that killed her husband. The case, Christensen v. Bowen, was one that Fort Lauderdale car accident attorneys watched closely as it received scrutiny from the Florida Supreme Court.
Continue reading →

Published on:

Distracted driving is a major problem in Florida, with the state highway patrol reporting nearly 40,000 crashes, 33,000 injuries and more than 200 deaths each year can be attributed to drivers who weren’t giving the road their full attention.

As Fort Lauderdale car accident attorneys, we know that distraction comes in many forms, and novice drivers tend to be most vulnerable. The most common distraction, however, is the use of cell phones. As April is Distracted Driving Awareness Month, it’s a good time to debunk some of the more common misconceptions surrounding the combination of cell phones and driving.

Texting behind the wheel gets a lot of attention, but reportedly “safer” alternatives, such as hands-free and voice-to-text options are equally risky. Some might even argue that these technologies are more dangerous because people mistakenly believe they are safe.
Continue reading →

Contact Information